A "Nonprofit" National C.L.U.B. and Animal Protection Organization to Protect Pet Owners.

A "Nonprofit" National C.L.U.B. and Animal Protection Organization to Protect Pet Owners.


Welcome to our National Organization known as Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom.

We the People, of this National "Nonprofit" Organization, want to express our appreciation to you for taking an "active"interest in preserving "your" rights to freely own your "pets"and "animals" without intrusion by the government, individuals, or "animal rights activist" groups or other organizations, who’s sole mission are to "eliminate" and "destroy" our freedom, liberty, and American way of life, with our pets and animals on our own private property as extended members of our families.

Laws are only words written on paper, words that change on society’s whim, and are interpreted differently daily by politicians, lawyers, judges, and policemen. We cannot by total reliance on law; escape our "duty" to judge right and wrong, and take "action" to stop the tyranny at "Freedom's Gate." For a person's religion is not worth it’s salt, if the animals and pets are not the better for it.

Dean A. Ayers, (Prior) Special Agent, AFOSI, U.S.A.F., United States of America.

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."



Please visit daily our National Organization's Official Article Publishers at the links below, with over 50 total articles on Dog Law, Pet Owners, Animal Welfare, Dogs, Pets, and Animal Articles affecting every pet Owner
in the USA and Canada.

Just CLICK on the 3 links below for separate articles numbering in excess of 50 articles to date in total.

Visit our many nationally published pet and animal articles
and postings at the following links. Then be sure to come 
back and read the rest of this web site's pages and articles as well.



http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/members/16235/Dean%20A.%20Ayers/

and

http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/583274/dean_a_ayers.html

and

http://www.AnimalsClubFreedom.typepad.com/

Animal control laws and officers challenge your right to dog ownership

Original Article Links:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/15426

and

http://animalsclubfreedom.typepad.com/

Animal control laws and officers challenge your right to dog ownership

Animal laws that limit the number of animals allowed in a household or vaguely define a “bad smell” in the pet owner’s home are intended to make it easier to prosecute individuals.

By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress ©

4 Oct. 09

 

Many dog owners in recent years have faced the unthinkable; a knock at their door that has heralded the arrival of an Animal Control officer with a complaint about your dog(s). In some cases that visit has been concluded satisfactorily to both the dog owner and the animal control officer; in others it has meant the heartache of either seizure of the owner’s dog(s) and/or facing stiff fines for various reasons in an abuse, neglect, or number limit citation.

With animal ownership laws now undergoing radical evolving changes throughout the country, the result is now a ‘perverted’ evolving animal “activist” produced animal care and control law now being used. Animal rights ‘extremists' some of which are in fact, animal control officers, and others working in animal  rights group legislation lobbies are the new means for dog owner 'harassment.' The constant upgrade of these radical ‘animal controlling’ laws drastically increases the ‘real’ possibility of a visit to your door on your own private property from Animal Control Authorities becoming ever more of a specter to haunt you and also every dog owner in the nation.

Specifically targeted by legislation ‘activists’ are creating the laws that 'limit' the number of dogs, cats, pets, and animals allowed in a household (by an unsubstantiated arbitrary pet ‘limit’ number) which is intended to make it easier to prosecute individuals who are thought to have "too many," according to this arbitrary standard put into the animal law.  Even more sinister is that these ‘activist’ pushed animal laws are also applied even to those people who are not in violation of health, nuisance and humane laws.

These dog or animal "number limit" laws are now being joined by various other anti-pet ownership restrictive laws, such as mandatory breeder permits and licensing requirements (being pursued for example at this time in Iowa legislation) for even a single one time litter of any dog and the owner is now faced with major state intrusive inspections for a kennel or breeder license for having more than 3 pets in the home, or having a single litter of puppies. All of this being “PAINTED” as the need to stop alleged puppy mills, which of course in most instances is “bull”. Other totally vague animal control laws that can threaten responsible dog owners who are not in any kind of notable breeding or kenneling business are those ‘activist’ lobbied animal laws that allow the animal control officer to ‘define’ the offense of “BAD SMELL” in the home as a violation in animal control care and control laws.  Many good and loving pet owners whose dogs are well cared for and kept as their extended family members are suddenly in violation of an animal control officers “definition of “BAD SMELL” in the home, based upon the pets living in their homes, rather than caged outside alone and exposed to the climate, like a beast.

Why, there are many people, who object to a ‘single turd’ in a field that can be smelled downwind from 3 miles away, and object to that smell as a “BAD SMELL” under animal law or other people who are obsessed, compelled or driven to use massive amounts of dangerous cleaning products (by the liter or gallon) in a home (that are dangerous to the health of the animals and humans alike)to kill any and all ‘bad’ smells; so take into account an ‘activist’ animal control officer, who is this described ‘clean freak’ inspecting pet owner homes, using this vague and intrusive animal law as a criminal, abusive, or neglectful animal law violation according to their ‘definition of a ‘BAD SMELL’ in the pet owners home.

This vague and intrusive ‘unbalanced’ definition of tyranny control in the animal law begs for fees, fines, confiscations, seizures, and ultimate adoption or euthanasia of properly maintained pet owner animals in their home. Tyranny at its core to allow an ‘activist’ animal control officer to ‘harass’ and ‘intimidate’ virtually any pet owner in their jurisdiction, based solely upon a “BAD SMELL?” Please! These ‘activist’ animal laws have completely gone over the edge of the cliff in dealing in ‘reality’ and ‘common sense’.

'Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom' National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit) is actively opposing all restrictive legislation limiting the responsible pet ownership of all dogs, cats, and other pets. Unfortunately some 'perverted' anti-pet ownership laws have still made their way onto the books. Just take a look at the 94 + page anti-pet ordinance of Louisville, KY by its Metro council, or the tyranny animal control laws with a three strike violation rule, taking away any right to owning any pet or animal in Omaha, Nebraska, or the 3-strike violation rule in Mills County, Iowa if your little 'fluffy' is caught off your private property 3 times. Your little "Fluffy" will be declared a "dangerous dog" according to their animal care and control ordinance for the county. How’s that for success in animal control laws stopping animal crimes in the midst of a rural county? These ‘activist’ based and promoted animal tyranny laws are occurring all across the nation as we speak. Ever more intrusive and controlling by the day.

For all dog owners, do we need reminded that it is important to promote the need for responsible freedom in the care and ownership of your dog(s) and pets in order to prevent tyranny from overcoming common sense in dog ownership matters? Or is it going to take a ‘knock at your door’ and an unlawful dog confiscation without any ‘due process’ for the dog owner to open your eyes to the truth in animal law "tyranny" now days?

 

Breeding even a single dog litter is now the ‘target’ of license laws

There is great value to society in the historic preservation of all our pet ownership of our chosen dog breeds as extended members of our family, and in the selective, planned breeding of our pets, for desirable and predictable traits in our chosen and favored dog breeds as well.

Claims that the organized dog fancy or local backyard hobby dog breeders contributes to the problem of homeless dogs in shelters cannot be supported by any alleged evidence from any Animal Rights activist groups, such as PETA, ELF, ALF, HSUS, ASPCA or any local humane society through facts that are real, not manufactured like liberal propaganda.

Above all else, dog owners, backyard dog hobbyists and dog fanciers must all become aware of the animal control laws in their own locale, and must also be aware of their 'rights' if faced with that ‘intrusive’ visit from an Animal Control Officer or Law Enforcement Officer regarding your pets and animals, and their ability to ‘harass’ you with vague and ‘interpretive’ definitions of the animal laws.

It is necessary for all dog and pet owners  to be familiar with all animal identification regulations for your dogs in your locale, as the future to continued further 'restrictive' local, county, state, or federal animal care, control, or identification regulations are potentially, only a 'stroke of the pen' away from being amended to include identification of many non-farm related pets and animals to be further controlled and cared for by government laws, due to any potential future transmission of a communicable animal disease in dogs or other pets or animals that may arise.

At that time, you and your dogs, and animals will then have to deal with Federal, State, and local animal control regulations on your private property, called a premises. Not only will you have a real possibility of 'animal control' showing up with restrictive regulations and ordinances of your dogs and your ownership freedom, but you will also have to deal with the 'dog-ma' of inspector police from the USDA animal and agriculture authorities or your state controlled 'dog-cops' checking your animals on your private property premises as well.

ALWAYS, Always, always, educate yourself and learn your animal control laws for your area and 'stand your ground' in knowing your 'rights' in responsible dog ownership. Always insure you have a name, and contact number for an Attorney at Law that is familiar with ‘Animal Law” in order to represent you and your dogs, not if, but when, the ‘activists’ in animal control come knocking at your door.

Remember when it comes to freely owning your dogs, pets and animals in an area frequented by Animal Rights Activists or Animal Control, "The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

NationalDogPress ©

 

 

 Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW: 

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2009,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

Posted by Dean A. Ayers, Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom on 10/04/2009 at 12:49 PM in "Due Process" Before Animal Control Takes Your Dog, A Chicken Lesson for Dog Owners, Animal Control, Animal Control Officers, Bad Smelling Pets, Books, C.L.U.B. QUOTE, Current Affairs, Dog and Human Euthanasia Unethical, Dog Insurance Requirements, Dog Law, Dog License Tyranny, Dog Ordinance Tyranny, Dog Rescue Action Needed,Dogs, Pets, and Animals, Due Process in Animal Laws, Film, Flaming Liberal Swords, Food and Drink, Freedom and Happiness, Games, GlenwoodIowa.org, Health Care, HEALTH CARE ALERT, Humane Health Care?, Humane Society Scam, INSANITY in Society, Life's Troubles, Mills County, Iowa, Music, NAIS Animal ID, NationalDogPress Newsletter, Nebraska Humane Society - NOT!, No Dogs in Canada and the USA , Our Nation Won't Survive, Pet Food, PETA DEATH CAMPS, Private Property Intrusion, Religion, RFID Chips, Sarah Palin , Sarah Palin HELP!,Science, Socialist America, Sports, Swine Flu Fraud?, Television, Thank You!, Travel, Web/Tech, Weblogs |Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Digg This | Save to del.icio.us

Your Pet Belongs to You, Not the Government

 

Dog Licensing Is An Outrage Your Pet Belongs to You, Not the Government by Dean A. Ayers        The erosion of our freedom to own dogs, pets and animals, rings true of the current political climate in the USA Today. We the People who own dogs, cats, pets and animals are especially struck by the public’s statements concerning agreement or apathy towards all the various government licensing to include that of our pets and animals. Definition of Licensing and the Misconceptions: Most people seem to believe that a dog or pet license is a freedom, when in true fact, it is a taking. A license is a temporary, revocable permit issued by government that allows the holder to have something or to do something that is otherwise illegal. For example, in the USA the licensing of firearms has virtually removed our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Any time a license is issued, a freedom is jeopardized. By the very act of licensing dogs, the act of owning or even possessing a dog has been made illegal. Animals are traditional property, now legally having “Intrinsic Value:” Animals are human-kind's most ancient and traditional property. Before ever we settled down to a plot of land and threw seeds in the soil, we numbered animals as our most valuable possessions. Wealth has always been associated with the number of animals that a person owned, and kept. Now animal ownership, use, and the ancient, honorable practice of animal husbandry are under global attack by dog laws, animal ID laws globally. It was initiated by the animal "rights" movement, and adapted by local, state, and federal governments throughout the world. A Dog's life has 'intrinsic value,' New York judge finds: Finding that a dog "is somewhere between a person and personal property," a New York trial court said a pet owner whose dog died following unauthorized surgery may seek damages beyond the purchase price of the animal. "[A dog] is not an inanimate thing that just receives affection; it also returns it," the court wrote, citing Corso v. Crawford, 97 Misc. 2d 530 (N.Y., Queens County Civ. Ct. 1979). Doing Away with Dog Ownership: All the dog legislation, animal control laws, dog ownership licensing, animal breeder licensing and animal ID programs will effectively do away with all but the largest commercial breeders and providers. When the small traditional owner and holder have been the basis for our animals and economy world-wide, it soon will end with all animals owned being controlled through licensing of many types and behaviors, as well as the food we all eat for life will be controlled by the seed products being copyrighted thru large commercial concerns like Monsanto, and those of us who have traditionally grown our own food or owned animals personally for various reasons will be locked out or the owners will be locked up literally, also known as “Jail” or animal shelters, etc. Read the rest of the article Copyright © 2009 Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Org. Inc.

Posted by Dean A. Ayers, Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom on 08/09/2009 at 01:30 PM in Books, Current Affairs, Dog Insurance Requirements, Dog Law, Dog Ordinance Tyranny, Dog Rescue Action Needed, Dogs, Pets, and Animals, Film, Food and Drink, Games, GlenwoodIowa.org, Health Care, Humane Health Care?, Music, My Dogs..., Pet Food, Private Property Intrusion, Religion, RFID Chips, Sarah Palin or Satire , Science, Socialist America, Sports, Television, Travel, Web/Tech, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Digg This | Save to del.icio.us

07/16/2009

A Culture of Pet 'Ownership' Death and Evil Clowns in Society

 

A Culture of Pet 'Ownership' Death and Evil Clowns in Society

By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress News ©

16 July 2009

Some people have likened the growing grass roots Pet Property Ownership movement all around the Earth, to a relatively small animal welfare lifeboat wheeling in an incredibly vast sea of perverted unstoppable Animal Rights (Evil Clowns) dog-ma of sea water filling the Titanic.

If you also think this way and that the sinking of the Titanic was a sad disaster, you will be heartbroken over the tragic devastation when this sort of occurrence happens on a planetary scale to your very own freedom to simply own an intact dog or cat, (let alone several pets in your household), without tyranny and intrusion by government animal control entities using mandatory anti-pet animal control laws.

Recently, I read an article about the death of birds, bats, bees and butterflies across the world. It didn't surprise me. Indeed, we can add to the list ever so many other species, also, heading towards extinction, including Asian elephants, frogs, toads, assorted big cats, polar bears, penguins, tunas, coral, vultures, chimpanzees, apes and dolphins. Indeed, the list goes on and on. Shockingly, there is, seemingly, no end to it or the reasons for it. Only now the next extinction will be your own -- right to own, raise or breed an intact dog or cat in your extended family on your own property called a premises.

This sort of happening in mind, our current perverted Animal Rights culture is, doubtlessly, a covertly brutal one, oriented towards razing the world for ever higher donation financial gains from an endless stream of manufactured propaganda campaigns and without concern for damaging side effects of radically perverted animal control laws and ordinances in every town, city and state in this Union.

As such, so-called humane animal shelters, animal rescue groups, and the Animal Rights society in general consisting of these perverted humans, keep ravaging ever further regions of the Earth, obliterating everything or anyone that gets in the way of their propaganda, monetary, legal or legislation goals as a culture of pet ownership death and "Evil Clowns" destruction in society.

All considered, perhaps our Animal Rights problem is capitalism, itself, as it is just too hard to forgo seeking ever greater donation revenues totaling millions, in an aim to deliberately protect the Perverted Animal Rights Activist environment.

Thru their enacted laws of mandatory spay/neuter, pro-euthanasia, and pet ownership limiting animal quantities along with requiring mandatory intrusive licensing and inspections according to Animal Rights mandated laws; Animal Rights people ensure their perverted culture of the maintenance and care of the dog and cat species can simply stay alive in their dictated minimal quantities. At this point in time, you will then, only be able to obtain a dog or cat via the Animal Rights humane society shelters, AR animal rescue groups, or major AR corporate breeder businesses that could meet the massively intrusive and expensive law requirements of kenneling, crating, breeding, licensing, inspections, Vet. Care, etc. being put into place by Pro Animal Rights Control Legislators.

Put another way, obtaining donation BIG money in exchange for your freedom to own personal premises property with INTACT pets is ever more greatly dismantled on the Earth in an irresistible temptation for far too many AR and "Evil Clowns." It's a sad day in the United States when Animal Rights radicals think they can affect every pet property owner in this way. We the People need to be the advocates against anti-pet laws, against Breed Specific Legislation (BSL), against Anti-Pet quantity limiting "parent-guardianship" against mandatory spay/neuter altering, mandatory animal ID, such as the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) and any canine or feline laws that We the People consider unconstitutional.

Anyone who knows anything about canines or felines realizes this is simply ridiculous, inconsistent, and hypocritical. Yet the AR activist extremists push it because it gives them power over "animal control." They use it as a stepping stone. Animal Rights Extremists have infiltrated many animal pounds, rescue agencies, and shelters. Achieving a 'NO BREED BIRTH NATION' IS JUST AROUND THE CORNER WITH MANDATED ALTERING--if you don't know what "No Birth Nation" is, Google it and it will lead right to PETA and similar AR organizations.

 

The Quiet Deception:

First they say eliminate this breed. Then, eliminate all breeding. Then, eliminate all dogs being sold. Then, eliminate all dogs as pets. It's not that difficult to figure out.

The Problem is not the Pet Owners; it's the Animal Rights (Evil Clowns) Propaganda agenda.

In TRUTH and the REAL WORLD:

1)  THERE IS NO REAL ANIMAL "OVERPOPULATION"

2)  SHELTERS THEMSELVES ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM IN FAILING THE ANIMALS AND NOT FINDING THEM HOMES FOR MANY REASONS.

Recently the evidence has shown that "re-homed" dogs and shelter dogs are responsible for a substantial amount of the fatal attacks across the country. Nearly 40% of the dog attacks have been attributed to "altered" (meaning neutered) dogs, despite the false 'theory' that that altered dogs make a dog "non-aggressive" to people.

Another study done in attempting to categorize dogs which bite children showed that 93% of the dogs which had bitten children were altered. This was surprising to the people doing the study, as many believe that altering a dog will render it non-aggressive. This is not true and only in some instances it might reduce some dog-dog aggression, whereas in others it may have little and no effect at all in a positive and constructive manner.

 

Perverted Animal Rights and Animal Protection Organizations:

It is no wonder that We the People are losing our freedom of pet property ownership freedom as the majority of people who own pets in society are sitting on their hands of in-action, and allowing the Animal Rights perverted agendas to maximize their assault thru enacting perverted animal control laws across this Nation.

You can see the AR agenda spreading world-wide. In searching Google, I was able to instantaneously bring up 248 Animal Rights Activist listings by USA state (city), and Animal Rights Activist organization listings for other countries. In our Nation that comprises the 50 States, it is no wonder they are a culture of pet ownership death and destruction in society.

These people are extremely sick and want to do away with your dogs and cats. Kill the sport of owning, showing, breeding, and hunting etc. And of course they will succeed because some people just don't get it yet... It doesn't matter if it's the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). 

The HSUS, International Society for Animal Rights On line, or a PETA group, they are all essentially the same. Even your local animal shelters think this way, presenting mandatory spay/neuter, euthanasia, limiting pet quantity, and massive animal control laws and enforcement as a so-called good thing which allows for a sustainable supply of dogs and cats to be regularly seized from owner's (like yourselves) with perverted animal control laws, to be adopted out or rescued in the name of humane treatment by animal control authorities.

 

Animal control in the name of humane?

That of course is truly just their propaganda spewing out. Their ends justify their means, and it is truly one of a perverted outlook on pet property ownership with one goal. Total tyranny control over the animals which totally controls you.  Almost every household in America has a pet of some type. That is a lot of control power. The AR Agenda is: Establish with the law and maintain a culture of pet ownership death and destruction in society.

 

The "Animal Rights" Activist Problem:

There are people so addicted to exaggeration they can't tell the truth without lying. ~Josh Billings

A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest.

The laws of necessity, of self- preservation, of saving our country and our people, to include our extended family pets, when in danger, are of higher obligation.

To lose our beloved pet animals, our family units and structure, an ultimately our freedom in this country by a unscrupulous adherence to written "anti-pet" ordinances and laws would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property, and all those in our family who are enjoying them with us. The Animal Rights perverted legislation animal control agenda is an absolute absurdity sacrificing the end to the means.

The "Perverted" List of Anti-Pet Ownership Proposals and Laws:

This is a list of proposed legislation and ordinances designed to take away your pet owning rights, little by little, one perverted step after another, making it so difficult, expensive, inconvenient, and legally risky to even own a dog, cat or any other pet:

1. Mandatory Spay/Neuter

2. Breeder Licensing (destroys hobby breeder who produce some of the
best and well-socialized purebreds)

3. Kennel Licensing w/Privatized Inspections

4. Differential Licensing

5. Potential Dangerous Dog Laws (High Risk Animal Designation)

6. Breed Specific Legislation/Registration 
(higher licensing fees, mandatory insurance minimums, breed-banning, 
mandatory muzzling, length and style of collars and leashes)

7. Anti-tethering and anti-crating Legislation

8. Pet Limit Laws

9. A parent-like 'Guardianship' Designation

10. Husbandry Limiting Laws (FLORIDA tried to make it where only a vet could worm dogs!)

11. Animal Control attempting to force 'euthanasia' on owner's pets or be charged with criminal animal abuse for maintaining old age pets with 'naturally' failing health issues

12. Anti-Hunting Laws

13. Anti-Fighting Laws (actually used to legislate hunting, coursing, by
animal on animal being considered fighting)

14. Mandatory RFID "Chip" Micro-chipping

15. Pet Licensing Public Data Bases (The whole world can read all about
your pets and know where you live!)

16. Legislating Unreasonable Medical Care Responsibility

17. Mandatory Temperament Testing

18. Purely Positive Training Methods 
Criminalizing Training Devices (training collars) or methods that include corrections

19. Containment Restrictions 
(height and type of fences, size of property, kennels, crates)

20. Mandated Care Requirements 
(dog must be walked 30 minutes each day)

21. Greater Police Powers by Animal Control Agencies to Enter Your
Property and Seize without warrants

22. Private Citizen/Agency Seizures ("BAD" Samaritan Laws) 
(allowing a private citizen or agency to remove an animal from your
property that they consider at risk)

23. Size limits and 'pet quantity' limits when no dog problems of care and maintenance exist

24. Anti-Cropping/Docking/De-clawing Legislation 
(but yet they will carve out your dogs internal reproductive organs!)

25. Out-lawing "Deformed" Breeds (English Bulldogs, Basset Hounds, etc.)

26. Legislation based on faulty research studies -- correlation studies
rather than causative (Did you know all people who drink water die?
Therefore we need to stop drinking water!) Correlation is not Causation!

27. Some European Countries, it is illegal to have a dog pull you that is not a northern breed?

28. Limited Ownership of Dogs by Convicted Felons (that makes it illegal for even Martha Stewart to own a dog).

29. Defining dogs as Weapons and making it illegal to use a dog as a
"weapon" (so long home protection)

30. Mandatory Animal Reporting and Identification programs (local, city, state, and federal systems)

31. ALL Breed Anti-Pet Ordinances (first used in Alta, Utah, and now in Louisville, KY in a 100 page ordinance, controlled by essentially one man (director of Animal Control) over every citizen with a pet or animal).

32. National Animal Identification System (NAIS) All the USDA has to do is amend their regulations, whenever they choose, to include dogs and cats, based upon a transmission threat of disease potential from the pet to a human.

 

What is the Truth about Pet Property Ownership Freedom?

Loving pet ownership and it's responsible exercise of pet 'property ownership' freedom is natural, desired by both animal and human, and a God given right to happiness for both humans and the animals.

 

Defend Pet Ownership Property Rights:

I care not much for a man's religion whose dog and cat are not the better for it. ~Abraham Lincoln

Animal Rights is not a "right" of stance to protect the animals. It is in place over all the Earth, like the Titanic, taking us all down to be "put down" literally to "destroy" the animals and the pet property owner's moral, legal, and religious ethics of loving, owning and maintaining their dogs, cats, or other pet animals. A GOD GIVEN RIGHT!

If you believe that you cannot make a "positive and constructive" difference to the defense of your own pet(s) and ownership freedom, from tyranny of the AR people and their organizations, then you won't make any difference!

 

I Say: Never under-estimate the power of one. That's YOU!

Get Involved and "Stand Your Ground."

Make the difference to preserve your "Intrinsic value" in Pet Property Ownership Freedom!

*****

Dean A. Ayers is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress News © and DogPress.org news press services owned by Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated.

PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925


Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2009,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News ©, All Rights Reserved

Posted by Dean A. Ayers, Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom on 07/16/2009 at 01:40 AM in Dogs, Pets, and Animals | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Digg This | Save to del.icio.us

Dog ordinance 'number limits' are not logical or valid

 

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom

 

Dog ordinance 'number limits' are not logical or valid

 

Dog 'number limit' ordinances lead to a decrease in pet license taxes collected from non-reporting owners over the pet limits. The 'number limit' laws are counterproductive.

 

MILLS COUNTY, Iowa, 7 July 09 (NationalDogPress.com) --

 

Dogs and dog owners face more discrimination than ever before in American society. While local, city, county, state, and federal entities pay lip service to the dog as man’s best friend by passing tyranny dog limiting ordinances and laws, We the People as a whole community allow fear and politics to determine the parameters of dog ownership based upon emotions not logic and common sense in law making.

 

We the People, spend hundreds of millions of dollars on premium foods, veterinary care, toys, kennels, pet sitters, training classes, and more even while limiting the number and type of dogs an owner can house. We use dogs to aid in catching criminals, search for victims of crimes and natural disasters, help handicapped humans, and provide emotional support even while barring dogs from communities if they exceed a certain weight, certain breed to be banned, or limits to the number of dogs allowed in a home even if they are properly cared for and loved as family.

 

 

The disadvantages of dog number limits in homes are:

 

Dog owners in some communities face a limit on the number of pets they can own, but these limits, too, are counterproductive.

 

Laws that criminalize pet ownership based on numbers alone have been declared unconstitutional in some states because they do not address the need to control nuisances or provide for the health and safety of residents.

 

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, the state’s highest court, has declared such a law unconstitutional in that state, citing a precedent in Kadash v City of Williamsport:

 

“What is not an infringement upon public safety and is not a nuisance cannot be made one by legislative fiat and then prohibited....

 

“Even legitimate legislative goals cannot be pursued by means which stifle fundamental personal liberty when the goals can otherwise be more reasonably achieved.”

 

A dog or pet limit ordinance is difficult to enforce without increased presence of animal control or police agencies and often leads to a decrease in pet licensing to prevent cross-referencing of license records. If the law is enforced only upon complaint, it becomes just another law for people to circumvent and further erodes confidence in legislative bodies.

 

Numbers have no relationship to nuisances. A person with one dog that runs loose or barks all night is a greater nuisance than a person with a dozen dogs that are quiet, clean, and kept at home.

 

Limiting people to four dogs (or fewer) puts an unreasonable strain on people who raise show dogs, compete in performance trials, participate in canine rescue operations, foster dogs for service dog organizations, etc. and can lead to those responsible dog owners leaving the community.

 

A number limit causes dog deaths by forcing people to give up dogs they own, thus causing crowding in local shelters; denying people the opportunity to buy an additional dog from a shelter or a rescue; and adversely impacting rescue groups and foster homes that help find new homes for dogs whose owners cannot keep them.

Alternatives to number limits are:

 

• Passage and enforcement of strict nuisance laws.
• Use of an arbitrator to mediate neighborhood disputes about animals.
• Use of alternative sentencing such as community service at the county animal shelter or attendance at a full obedience training course for those who violate nuisance ordinances.
• Periodic programs or mailings about responsible dog ownership or city sponsorship of a Canine Good Citizen test to encourage residents to be responsible dog owners.

 

Animal laws are not always a result of state and federal battles. Squabbles between neighbors often erupt over animals, squabbles that often spill over into law enforcement or animal control filed complaints to local governments.  

 

As an emotional result the local government greases the squeaky wheel complaints by citizens with even more stricter ordinances or other tacked on to the zoning code or the criminal codes to existing animal ordinances.

 

Dog limit ordinances are often passed out of frustration, with little consideration for the consequences or valid and factual basis to make any “positive or constructive” benefit to the community dog complaints, other than a government official “feel good” action giving We the People even more tyranny in our local animal control ordinances.

 

Copyright © 2006-2009,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization, All Rights Reserved

 

 

Dean A. Ayers
Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©, and DogPress.org news press services.
 
Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2009,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization, All Rights Reserved

Choose Christ or the Dogma of the “Mark of the Beast?”

 

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom

4 July 09

Choose Christ or the Dogma of the “Mark of the Beast?”

 

When the time comes? - Or have we already?

 

by Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©

Author’s Note: This article is provided as "Food for Thought" regarding the Prophecy of the "Mark of the Beast" and not for it's religious "accuracy" according to any particular faith, or my personal beliefs. ~ Dean A. Ayers

”And I have been supported under trials and troubles of every kind, yea, and in all manner of afflictions; yea, God has delivered me from prison, and from bonds, and from death; yea, and I do put my trust in him, and he will still deliver me.”

 

Nearly every Christian is keenly aware that the Bible warns of a certain "mark of the beast" that must never be accepted. Yet few Christians are aware that they have already accepted government identification and licenses for themselves and even their own dogs in “RFID” identification “chipping” that are the slippery slope leading to the final "mark" of the beast. 

Revelation 13:17 explains that in the end times people will not be able to "buy or sell" without "the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name." The name and number of the beast are already an accepted part of every citizen's daily business, and wholeheartedly accepted by mainstream Christianity. 

The "name" of the beast is a person's name spelled in all capital letters. It is a distinct identity created by government (the beast). A state issues a driver's license to John Doe in all capital letters — JOHN DOE. The same is true of a credit card, a bank checking account and the Social Security card. The created "person" does not have the same God-given rights as the flesh and blood man or woman (you) when operating under their given Christian name.

The "number of the beast" is the government assigned number that is attached to the created "person." For example, Mr. JOHN DOE applies for a state driver's license, and government creates JOHN DOE, #123456789. JOHN DOE signs the license, and agrees to operate in the system of commerce as JOHN DOE, #123456789. In effect, he (or she) assumes the identity created for them by the beast. 

Throughout the world today it is already extremely difficult to "buy or sell" without the created (all capitals name) and its assigned number as identification. A bank account, credit card, driver's license and Social Security all use the "name" and "number" of the beast. Accepting the beast's ungodly money system and surrendering your God-given rights instead, for beast issued privileges is how you are lead to unwittingly "worship the image of the beast." While the subject of how you "worship" is hotly contested by those seeking to justify their position, Romans 6:15 puts it rather succinctly: 

"Know ye not that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or obedience unto righteousness." 

If you study this passage, you'll see that either option is "obedience," but one path is sinful and leads to death, and the other is associated with righteousness and leads to life. While a lengthy exposition of the much distorted 13th chapter of Romans is beyond the scope of this present article, the simple fact is this verse in Romans 6 states that one form of obedience leads to death. 

The bad news is that the entire world is preparing to accept the final "mark of the beast" — the one that brings God's condemnation and eternal damnation (see Revelation 14:9). Worse yet, they will do it while quoting from the bar-coded NIV Bibles we carry, which are allegedly copyrighted in publishing by only one man, and it’s not Christ, mind you. Putting religion aside and speaking about reality, just what will our hope and change in reality be like?

 

A worldwide identification card with microprocessors and even under-the-skin microchips will enable a totally cashless — and Godless — beast society.

The United Nations is currently considering a plan proposed by Belgium's Pascal Smet for universal identification and registration of every person in the world. Mr. Smet points out that the European Union is considering a fingerprint or eye scan to identify every European. "There are no technical problems. It is only a question of will” by the government, according to Smet. 

Since the beginning of this new beastly identification age began in the year 2002, more than 100 nations have some form of national ID system in place. In Spain an ID card is required at age 14; in Argentina at age 8; in Germany at age 16; in Belgium at age 15. Kenya requires national ID to be carried at all times by all citizens. In America, a Social Security number is required in order to receive a wage at almost any place of employment. In Texas if a law enforcement officer requests to see your identification and you fail to provide it you can be charged with a criminal offense of “failure to identify.” The very concept of working for a living implicitly embodies "buying and selling" — vis a vie exchanging your hours of effort in return for a financial remuneration.

A poll by the Pew Research Center showed that 2/3 of Americans support the mandatory display of a national ID card on demand in order to "feel safe and secure." So-called Smart-cards, an identity card with embedded chips are already in use by 120,000 U.S. military troops, and the goal is to issue 4 million cards within two years. 

This technology has already been proven by Applied Digital Systems (ADS), the inventors of the so-called digital angel. ADS holds patents on “RFID” chips which are currently implanted in more than one million pets and animals to track and identify them. The embedded chips are already in voluntary use in many humans, such as heart patients with pacemakers or artificial valves, and even knee and hip replacement patients. An “RFID” chip implant is now required for all convicted sex-offenders in California. 

Richard Sullivan, the CEO of ADS, says the chips will shortly be in widespread use in children, the elderly and employees at secure facilities. He believes society will quickly accept the “RFID” chip in place of ATM and credit cards. ADS are actively lobbying congress to force the implanting of an “RFID” chip in every foreigner admitted to theUS in order to identify and track them. The company expects approval from the FDA within 18 months for unlimited use of their chips in humans.

Plans for the massive databases and infrastructure needed for "the mark of the beast" system are well under way. The American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators is working to link all state drivers’ license databases with high-tech licenses using biometric identifiers, bar codes and computer chips. Currently in America, state and federal police authorities use the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database for identification purposes on vehicle stops. The US Department of Justice and the General Services Administration have admitted working on a standardized national ID system based upon the state driver's license. The Air Transport Association wants a travel card/ID system with biometric identifiers. 

America's War on Terrorism is spreading throughout the world. Fourteen of the nineteen terrorists that attacked Americaon 9/11 had forged ID papers. Obviously, standard identification papers and cards are easily forged. The desire for safety and security makes the world population willing to submit to a unified system of identification for every person in the world. 

The technology is already in place, so this is the obvious governmental beastly solution to the "problem" of identifying the undesirable elements among us. And the beast is ready to mandate it. A facial scan or hand scan are the quickest systems yet devised, and require the least digital storage. 

What is truly startling is how few Christians have actually thought through the decision as to where they will draw the line. Most just vaguely say that they will refuse to accept any “RFID” chip implant while they take their dogs and cats to the Vet. the same day to have the animals implanted with the exact same “RFID” chips used for humans by the beast.

 

A few Christians have already publicly stated they will immediately accept any imbedded chip because Jesus "will forgive even that." These usually cite Scriptures speaking of submission to governing authorities and that God is all love and grace with no accountability by our own actions and decisions for us sinners who fail his teachings.

Others have recognized the spiritual nature of submission — and how the decision to abide or not to abide within the edicts of the beast is precedent to any final numbering scenario. These believe that their present refusal to function within existing political and commercial parameters is crucial to recognizing where the line will ultimately be drawn. These non-conformists are already resisting on a variety of levels, including renouncement of the Social Security number and a refusal to be licensed to drive or pay taxed licenses on pets. Not an easy thing to do in a society where driver's licenses are mandated to even get to a food store from home, or to even legally possess a dog or cat in your county without paying an animal “Tax License” or you risk being apprehended and your pet confiscated for being in violation of the county law (example: Mills County, Iowa Animal Care and Control Ordinance, passed 1 March 09).

Vast numbers of Christians confidently believe they will be raptured before the final requirement to receive a beast sanctioned identity is implemented. The simple truth is, the "mark of the beast" system has already ensnared significant numbers of "believers" who will simply continue to readjust their rationalizations as the beast slowly but surely tightens his grip on an already undiscerning Christian church. And still no rapture has saved them, nor ever will, from the beast.

"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads;” 

"And that no man might buy or sell, save he had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name." (Revelation 13:16, 17) 

So my question to you all is? Subject: Mark of the Beast – Will you choose Christ or the Beast? – When the time comes? - Or have we already gone down that slippery slope of the beast by allowing our dogs, cats, pets, and animals to be “chipped?”

 

“I beseech of thee that thou wilt hear my words and learn of me; for I do know that whomsoever shall put their trust in God shall be supported in their trials, and their troubles, and their afflictions, and shall be lifted up at the last day.”

 

Give ear to my article and thoughts, good people. Learn the truth and educate yourselves not to be deceived, bit by bit, such as when you’re county, city, state or federal government entities mandate “RFID” chipping, and various other mandatory identification requirements, in order just to survive. Do not stand by and allow your freedom to be “chipped” away, even with your pets. It always begins with the animals, and then the government escalates the beast to us humans. It’s not yet too late, but it soon will be.

 

Remember what I spoke to you about in this article, and also take caution in the ramblings of “hope and change” we will all soon receive from a beast. Come to know the present and future visions and plans of our government entities for the conversion of all Americans both human and animal to a “Mark of the Beast.”

 

 ###

 

Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©, and DogPress.org news press services.
 
Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2009,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization, All Rights Reserved

 

Posted by CODE: RED - Final Notice at 10:20 PM 

Newly Proposed Animal Care and Control Ordinance for Mills County, Iowa

 

NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©

'ALERT' for Mills County, Iowa Animal Owners

Newly Proposed Animal Care and Control Ordinance for Mills County, Iowa

MILLS COUNTY, Iowa, June 28 (NationalDogPress.com) --

On 28 June 09, this Lead Investigative Reporter was personally contacted by an individual who requested anonymity and advised the following about animal control in Mills County, Iowa:

 

On this same date, a neighbor was visited by an officer with the Mills County Sheriff Department regarding a complaint of a dog at large chasing a horse. Upon contact with the neighbor the deputy (not named) allegedly informed the neighbor that any dog running loose off the property had better be licensed per a new animal ordinance in Mills County or the Deputy could issue a citation for dogs at large and confiscate them, sending them to the "ARF" animal rescue shelter. The Deputy allegedly continued stating, “a dog license would have to be purchased from the ‘ARF’ animal shelter”.

 

The person requesting anonymity advised this Investigator they were unaware of any such ordinance or of any animal shelter in Mills County, and this was the first they had heard of it from the neighbor or Deputy Sheriff. This Investigator was asked to investigate whether Mills County, Iowa in deed has this type of ordinance or animal shelter in force now.

 

Upon receiving this information, this Investigative Reporter conducted an inquiry into the validity of this ordinance complaint and the following information was disclosed. A review of the following official Mills County, Iowa web site http://www.millscoia.us/announcements.htm does in fact identify a newly proposed animal care and control ordinance dated from 2008 in PDF format.

 

The last update to the proposed animal control ordinance appears to be 2 June 2008 and it appears to be unsigned or approved in the PDF document. However, the proposal notification on the Mills County, Iowa web site dated 28 June 2009, reflects this animal control proposal is renewed and is now a current animal care and control county ordinance proposal. 

 

You can read the entire animal care and control proposal of 16 pages for Mills County, Iowa at the following link:

 

http://www.millscoia.us/publicnotices_announcements/Ordinance08-03_AnimalCareandControl.pdf

 

The complainant who spoke to this Investigative Reporter stated the following about this new animal control information 'coming to light' in Mills County, Iowa:

 

"It could happen any time," they said. "I'll just be surprised if it doesn't."

 

Further Investigative inquiries are being conducted to obtain more up to date information on the status of this proposed animal care and control ordinance posted on Mills County, Iowa web site as of 28 June 09.

Stay tuned. This appears to be proposed "under the table" from the county citizen public's view.

 · Return to Website ·

© NationalDogPress.com Headline News

 

by Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress.com

Email: Dogpressorg@aol.com

Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©, and DogPress.org news press services.
 
Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2009,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization, All Rights Reserved